I enjoy a loose but ongoing connection with a gay men’s
organization that I admire, respect, and hold in great affection. I remember
years ago coming into the main assembly room at one of its gatherings to find
silhouette symbols of major world religions hanging in the windows.
Notably because uniquely missing was the Cross. The Sanskrit
calligraphy for the sacred syllable Aum was mounted upside down. I’m guessing
there were no Hindus in the room to point that out. And then there’s the
frequency with which gay spiritual gatherings get scheduled smack in the middle
of the Jewish High Holidays. As for calling the directions--well, what overwhelmingly
Euro-American New Age gay group hasn’t
appropriated that particular ceremony from Native American spiritual practice?
I totally get the toxicity of Christianity for those who’ve
suffered the homophobic, anti-erotic pronouncements that so often poison its
well. And I’m the last person to fault queer men for piecing together ritual
patterns and spiritual expressions we can live with from as many traditions as
we find available. It’s our genius as faggots to deck our deepest selves out in
borrowed fashions, our radical drag of the soul. We found something wonderful
at the back of Aunty’s closet. She may not be too happy about what we’ve done
with her Dior gown, but we know we look fabulous in it. Angels in America is as brilliant an example of that as you’ll
find, but hardly the only one.
Still, I agonize a lot about appropriation and exclusion,
twin moral perils of life as a privileged, white, cisgendered gay man. The more
so when I officiate at a ritual I first created seven years ago and have been
leading since--a Lingam Puja that borrows its name from Hindu practice, but
strays about as far from authentic Hindu ritual as Mass at St Patrick’s
Cathedral parts company with a Passover Seder. Instead of the smooth, abstract
cylinder that stands as the focal point in a Shiva temple, the Lingam we gather
around is a very recognizable sculpture of an erect cock. Then too, I’ve
developed parts of the ceremony straight out of a high Episcopalian Eucharist--though
no one who doesn’t make the connection for himself needs to know that.
Sometimes I include readings from contemporary Buddhist teachers, or from Rumi
and Hafiz. I am, after all is said, a slut who will pray with anybody.
My fellow devotees and I are risking the alienation of established
spiritual communities left and right in this ritual. But the centrality of an
anatomically accurate Lingam isn’t potentially an offense only to Hindus who
see us ripping off a venerable tradition that doesn’t properly belong to us--a
formerly colonized one, at that. A twenty-inch wooden dick on the altar makes
it pretty clear that this ritual addresses humans who have a penis and have
gathered to own and honor the Divine’s presence in the wondrous bit of flesh
that hangs between our legs--“the exposed tip of the heart, the wand of the
soul,” as our Prophet St. James Broughton put it.
I’ve spent the last
sixty years falling deeper into the truth that the Sacred is in this body, in
all of this body. In the specifics of this body. This heart. These hands. This
cock.
I’ve spent decades striving to claim fully my desire for the
tribe of those who experience a similar truth. My tribe. The tribe of
penis-bearing humans who love other penis-bearing humans. Who through our
experience of jacking alone and with friends, of frotting and sucking and
fucking with each other, are diving deeper into how living in a body with a
penis shapes our relation to the world, and our relationship to the Sacred.
None of this is unconditioned truth. It’s not the working
out of some universal archetype. It’s a result of living in this body, in these
bodies, with these bodies’ histories. It’s my embodied truth, not identical
with, but akin to, the embodied truth of my comrades. To live out this truth in
their company is the deep desire of my heart and soul. My cock is a key to the
inner temple, and I long to gather with others whose cocks are keys to the
inner temple. There are other keys to the inner temple. There is conceivably a
point when the inner temple is opened so wide that keys are no longer relevant.
But I need the companionship of those who know, from deep, embodied experience,
how this key fits into the lock. Who know the feel of this key turning in the
lock, the sound of this key opening the lock.
I don’t believe any of this this has to be viewed as an
attempt at exclusion. I know some people will say this is a dodge. But I still
insist on owning my experience and staying true to it. I’d be deeply uncomfortable
with the idea of shutting others out of the circle--cisgendered and trans
women, trans men, cisgendered men whose erotic lives aren’t focused on cock. But
there’s no denying that the ritual I lead isn’t focused on them and their
experience of the world. Instead, I’m open to welcoming such fellow humans into
the circle as visitors, much as I might welcome a Hindu friend attending Mass
as a visitor, much as a Muslim friend might welcome me to his mosque, much as
the rabbi of the shul my partner attends in the summer would tell me, I’m
pretty sure, that no matter how many times I come to services, no matter how
many times I put on my prayer shawl, no matter how glad she is I’ve come, I’m
still a visitor, and not a Jew.
People I respect have asked whether I’m not really
perpetuating imperialist attitudes to world cultures by drawing on them.
They’ve asked whether I’m not perpetuating patriarchy by encouraging
cisgendered men to gather in celebration of the beauty and holiness of the
Lingam. But imperialist patriarchy hasn’t flourished because white cisgendered men
are comfortable with our bodies and bond successfully with other men.
Patriarchal privilege and misogyny are founded, paradoxically, on the insistence that cisgendered men deny our own vulnerably embodied experience. Patriarchy demands that we pretend our unpredictable, permeable, changeable, leaky bodies are irrelevant to our privileged place in the world. Patriarchy wants us to see other men as rivals who either
pose potential threats or can be dominated. I borrow from the wisdom and
practice of as many traditions as I have access to. I reject the homophobic
crap that virtually no tradition is innocent of. I claim my experience of God
in my faggot body as my own and forge a community out of what I share with my
fellow travelers. This is as anti-patriarchal as I know how to be.
Amen. Well said. Elegantly said.
ReplyDeleteAn honest and valuable piece of literature. I believe being mindful and devoting one's self to mankind via a sexual channel is the most one can give. Through a Phallic brotherhood is the way to the new world we are heading for. Thank you.
ReplyDelete